|
||||||||||||||
Enlightening the CEO on Business Continuity Planning |
||||
|
Many business continuity and disaster recovery planners complain they cannot get visibility in the boardroom. We offer advice on gaining visibility and the commitment required for effective continuity planning. |
|||
|
Bottom Line
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Key Issue
What strategies should organizations employ to provide business process protection in the event of a disaster? |
|||
|
We often receive inquiries from disaster recovery and business continuity planners wanting to know how they can gain management commitment. Frequently, these individuals are "lone rangers" within their enterprises, espousing the need for disaster recovery and business continuity planning but having little authority and budget control. With the distributed nature of business processes, responsibility for business continuity must reside within business units (with policies set centrally). Senior management should understand how important its level of commitment is to the success of the program (see Note 1 for examples of why this is critical). |
|||
|
Note 1 Senior Management Commitment In the event of a disaster, for example, funding must be available in a timely manner. If the person who normally signs off is unavailable, he or she must identify a successor or another method to ensure the timely release of money. Another example is that declaring a disaster may mean the enterprise must notify the disaster recovery hot site service provider and begin expending large amounts of money. The timeliness of this decision is extremely important since a regional disaster may mean enterprises are competing for time at the disaster recovery site. On the other hand, declaring a disaster may result in expenditures that are especially painful if the disaster recovery site is never used due to a disaster being less severe than originally thought. |
|||
|
Senior management must understand the need for its involvement and for a corporate sponsor or oversight committee. Enterprises with best business continuity and disaster recovery practices have a corporate culture espousing availability, an understanding of the costs associated with business process outages and a realization that following a well-defined process when disaster strikes is significantly better (resulting in less downtime and costs) than chaos. Here, we provide a summary of techniques that business continuity and disaster recovery planners can use to enlighten the executive team and shore up necessary commitment. Create Awareness: First and foremost, the CEO is aware of the year 2000 compliance problem, which should be used as leverage to fund business continuity. For many enterprises, year 2000 compliance is the best thing that ever happened to business continuity and disaster recovery funding for the following reasons. 1) It is raising awareness of potential risks (e.g., interruptions in the supply chain) and the importance of applications used in critical business processes. 2) Making the CEO aware of incidents within and outside the company will help with risk recognition and benefits of planning. Inventorying and reporting enterprisewide incidents specifically focusing on facility outages is one way to raise awareness. Showing videotapes of actual incidents and their aftermath also illustrates the importance of planning, as does talking with other regional enterprises that have experienced disasters; it also reinforces the threat of a disaster (see Note 2). 3) For publicly traded companies, the CFO, internal audit committees and external auditors can help raise awareness of risks and corporate responsibilities (see Note 3). For nonpublicly traded enterprises with high visibility (e.g., governmental agencies, hospitals and nationalized industries), training for handling the press after an incident can also raise awareness. |
|||
|
Note 2 Awareness Campaign Many professional organizations and publications are devoted to business continuity and disaster recovery planning and can help with awareness campaigns. Three examples are Disaster Recovery Journal (www.drj.com), Contingency Planning & Management (www.contingencyplanning.com) and Survive (www.survive.com). In addition, business continuity and disaster recovery hot site service providers (i.e., Comdisco, IBM Business Recovery Services and SunGard) offer videotapes and case studies of enterprises recovering from disasters using their facilities. |
|||
|
Note 3 Appealing to Fiduciary Responsibility If all else fails, business continuity and disaster recovery planners should carefully appeal to executive management's fiduciary responsibility; however, reminding management of its responsibilities may be at great risk to the career of the business continuity planning professional. Senior management has a responsibility to protect corporate assets; otherwise it risks negligence and potential liability. Business continuity and disaster recovery planners should get assistance from the legal and auditing departments, and corporate risk management from the insurance perspective, as effective planning can reduce insurance premiums. |
|||
|
Perform an Informal BIA or Risk Assessment: Business continuity and disaster recovery planners should interview LOB managers to determine the impact on business processes if specific sites are unavailable for varying time periods. Business continuity and disaster recovery planners should assist LOB managers in walking through disaster scenarios and assessing costs, and should share the results with executive management. Impact will include direct costs (e.g., lost revenue and productivity) and indirect effects (e.g., relationships and reputation with customers, suppliers and business partners). Business continuity and disaster recovery planners should use these findings to get support, commitment and funding. Having business continuity responsibility in LOBs (as opposed to the IS organization) offers the best chance for adequate business continuity funding and disaster recovery funding within the IT budget. A side benefit of performing the informal BIA will be a better justification and prioritization of current expenditures for disaster recovery. Bottom LineTo gain greater business continuity and disaster recovery visibility as well as commitment from executive management, business continuity and disaster recovery planners should create an awareness campaign, and leverage their year 2000 compliance contingency planning efforts to ongoing business continuity and disaster recovery planning. Working with LOB executives on an informal BIA or walk-through test can also shore up support. After trying these techniques, if a business continuity or disaster recovery planner still does not obtain necessary management commitment, he or she should either accept the enterprise's apathy (and document that management has accepted the risk and potential liability) or seek a business continuity or disaster recovery position in an enterprise that cares before a disaster strikes and removes that option. Related Research For more information on performing a business impact assessment and assessing costs of downtime, see Research Notes KA-04-4892 and TU-07-0080 and SMS Research Note K-864-1511, 16 August 1994. Acronym Key BIA Business impact assessment LOB Line of business |
|||
|
This research is part of a set of related research pieces. See AV-14-5138 for an overview. |
|||
|
Entire contents © 1999 Gartner, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction of this publication in any form without prior written permission is forbidden. The information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. Gartner disclaims all warranties as to the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of such information. Gartner shall have no liability for errors, omissions or inadequacies in the information contained herein or for interpretations thereof. The opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice.
Resource ID: 299928 |
||